Mystery of the 'Mandela Effect' - Are 'False Memories' Proof of Parallel Universes?

A controversial and intriguing theory suggests that 'false memories' could be proof of parallel universes.

Scientists are naturally divided on this topic and most think false memories are a result of how we misremember things. Yet, perhaps there is more to it than we are aware of. It has been suggested that people are sliding between multiple universes and that's how we can create very odd memories of something we have never seen or heard in this world.

We have previously discussed the possibility that some of our dreams may be glimpses of events taking place in an alternate reality, a parallel Universe.

Another intriguing theory is that parallel universes could explain the déjà vu phenomenon. It's the feeling, or impression that you have already witnessed or experienced a current situation.

For a long time, this eerie sensation has been attributed to everything from paranormal disturbances to neurological disorders, but it has also been suggested that there is a hidden connection between déjà vu and the existence of parallel universes.

The theory that 'false memories' can be traced to the existence of parallel universes is rather new, but we will undoubtedly hear much more about it in the near future.



Another intriguing possibility is that there is a hidden connection between déjà vu and the existence of parallel universes.

The Mandela Effect And It's Connection To Parallel Universes

The term 'Mandela Effect' was coined by blogger Fiona Broome when she discovered that she, along with many others, shared the same, distinct memory of former South African President Nelson Mandela dying in a South African prison in the 1980s.

Mandela died in 2013, in the comfort of his home, having served as South Africa's President for some time after the 80s.

Basically, the Mandela Effect refers to a phenomenon in which a large number of people share false memories of past events, referred to as confabulation in psychiatry.

Some have speculated that the memories are caused by parallel universes spilling into our own, while others explain the phenomenon as a failure of collective memory.

Gene A. Brewer, Ph.D, an Associate Professor at Arizona state University's Department of Psychology have studied memory through experiments and neuro-imaging and he doesn't think there is a connection between false memories and parallel universe.

"All of us fall victim to false memory. We all misremember things, and we do it in a stereotypical way," said Brewer.

"Our systems work very similarly to one another. So I may have a false memory, you may have a false memory, and those could be very similar to one another," Professor Brewer said.

Why Do We Misremember So Many Things?

According to Professor Brewer said it is due to recombination, or a daily process in which a person's brain takes fragments from the past, and tries to reassemble them in a way that makes sense.

"As you're trying to remember what the Monopoly Man may have looked like, you may inadvertently remember some bits and pieces about the planters peanut man," said Professor Brewer.



Professor Brewer explained that a human brain remembers the "top ha" * on both mascots, and subconsciously placed Mr. Peanut's eyeglass onto Monopoly Man's face.

Professor Brewer said the Mandela Effect can also be explained by a process called collective remembering.

"We communicate false memories through the groups that were associated to," said Brewer.

"That leads to a cultural false memory, where many people hold the same false belief that things happened that didn't really happen."

Dave Campbell, a medium and hypnotherapist has an entirely different opinion.

"Some people say past lives, some people say our souls split in many pieces, and we can experience many lives at the same time.

Sometimes, we have similar inventions in different universes at the same time, like microwave. In one universe, we might call it a microwave, and in another universe, we call it a quick cooker," Campbell said.

It will take some strong arguments and evidence to convince cognitive scientists that false memories are the result of peoples' visits to parallel worlds, especially since physicists still haven't found conclusive proof that parallel worlds do exist.

But all controversial theories are intriguing and should be investigated.

It cannot be denied that there is still so much we do not know about the nature of space and time, not to mention our role in the Universe...

Multiverse

Dimensions and Hyperdimensions

What is The Matrix?

https://youtu.be/AGZiLMGdCE0

From one point of view, the Matrix is a central block of energy that is fed by millions of loops and tubes of energy—and those loops are all human actions that follow a script called:

THE HUMAN CONDITION.

“The human condition” is a fake image of the limitations of human life, plus all the implications and melodramas that follow from it.

You can imagine it as one vast bureaucracy, in which the workers are grossly unhappy with what is going on and yet love every misstep, mistake, postponement, crisis, and grinding routine.

It’s a culture. To one degree or another, it pervades every area of life.

As long as limitation is the overriding principle, the human-condition drama is going to play over and over again. The faces and names will change, but the production will go on.

Limitation has to do with: obscuring the existence, range, and power of imagination. Limitation is ultimately based on the PRETENSE THAT IMAGINATION IS AN UNIMPORTANT FACULTY.

Once you accept that pretense, life as we know it and the “human condition” follow as night follows day.

The “human condition” and its implications are really coming into their own now—they are being promoted as the reason we must have “share-and-care”global governance that continues to advance its agenda. Which includes cradle to grave medical status as a patient with constant need for treatment.

Global governance resonates closely with the Matrix.

The US Constitution was written for an agrarian society of about six million people who were living in a relatively small area along the east coast of the continent.

Thomas Jefferson’s view was that each generation, every 20 years or so, should write their own Constitution. This is a rather staggering point, ignored by most so-called conservatives.

Jefferson also believed a Republic would succeed only if the population was rather small.

So, for example, we might now have 50 or 60 separate Republics on this continent—each one writing a new Constitution every 20 years.

If that were the case, the present national government in Washington DC would be a thing of the past. Gone.

The 50 or 60 Republics would hopefully maintain good relations with one another, and one assumes Bill of Rights provisions would be part of each Republic’s basic law.

Decentralized government.

I would favor at least 200 Republics on this continent.

That way, citizen participation in government would actually mean something.

One Republic, so-called, with a population of 330,000,000 people, trying to fulfill The General Good of All, is going to fail progressively and spectacularly. The taxation rate alone is a disaster. Further, the attitude of the central government is going to be shaped by people who think in terms of 330 million people—planners, problem solvers, bureaucrats and administrators. And this tendency is going to slant action in the direction of attending to the masses, as units or groupings, rather than as individuals. It’s a self-defeating proposition.

I believe a man like Alexander Hamilton, however, saw this future and did not flinch from it, because in his eyes “the people” were doomed from the beginning by their nature and character. They had to be ruled from above.

It was Jefferson who was more optimistic about the potential of the individual.

In our world today, we are seeing big governments getting bigger—as a strategy for solving their unsolvable problems. The venality and greed and duplicity of political leaders are all about extending top-down control. It’s not just a plan, it’s what happens when the nation is so large, because the people who naturally gravitate to “serve” have this predilection for power/control.

The weave of the reality-Matrix and big government harmonize. They both exist to make people passive receptors.

“I’m basically John Jones living in the Untied States in 2011. I’m trying to get ahead. I’m encountering problems and trying to solve them. I’m looking out on the world from this point of view. I have no reservoir of inherent power. I’m striving. I’m doing the best I can…”

This is the shrunken attitude of a member of Matrix reality.

It is fostered by a minimized and restricted sense of possibility.

And THAT naturally seeps in when imagination is not the prime piece of the equation.

Imagination not only conceives of extended possibility, it projects it into space and time AND BEYOND.

When imagination swings into operation, physical reality is more an occasion for creating new realities, rather than a definer of reality.

The difference is crucial.

In 1932, Henri Bergson wrote, “The universe is a machine for creating gods.”

The Matrix plus John Jones is a collaboration that brings gods into being, the result of which is passivity.

As I’ve written before, the universe (Matrix) is one work of art among a potentially infinite number of works of art. The idea of exploring one work of art to the point of obsession, to the point of forgetting all the other potential works of art and the “means of their production” (imagination) is the sine qua non of the Matrix.

Imagination exceeds the space-time continuum.

You have a choice. You can go along for the ride in Matrix, or you can imagine imagination and embark on the journey of journeys.

Most people are not up to contemplating the idea of consciously creating, much less spontaneously improvising, which involves a kind of merging with what they would create.

But for those who can grasp such an idea, the world and the universe aren’t any longer arbiters and rule makers and guides. They are inventions that are already here.

Ensuing years of research resulted in my three recent Matrix collections, of which Exit From The Matrix is most focused on practical techniques of imagination — to make your deepest desires fact in the world.

by Jon Rappoport on August 17, 2017

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

#Equality

https://youtu.be/XM-HJT8_esM?list=RDXM-HJT8_esM

Child and Marraige

I have a question for you alone, my brother: like a sounding-lead, cast I this question into your soul, that I may know its depth. You are young, and desire child and marriage. 

But I ask you: are you a man entitled to desire a child? Are you the victorious one, the self-conqueror, the ruler of your passions, the master of your virtues? 

Thus do I ask you. Or does the animal speak in your wish, and necessity? Or isolation? Or discord in you? 

I would have your victory and freedom long for a child. Living monuments shall you build to your victory and emancipation. 

Beyond yourself shall you build. But first of all must you be built yourself, rectangular in body and soul. 

Not only onward shall you propagate yourself, but upward! For that purpose may the garden of marriage help you! 

A higher body shall you create, a first movement, a spontaneously rolling wheel - a creating one shall you create. 

Marriage: so call I the will of the twain to create the one that is more than those who created it. 

The reverence for one another, as those exercising such a will, call I marriage.

Let this be the significance and the truth of your marriage. But that which the many-too-many call marriage, those superfluous ones - ah, what shall I call it?

Ah, the poverty of soul in the twain! Ah, the filth of soul in the twain! Ah, the pitiable self-complacency in the twain! 

Marriage they call it all; and they say their marriages are made in heaven. 

Well, I do not like it, that heaven of the superfluous! No, I do not like them, those animals tangled in the heavenly toils! 

Far from me also be the God who limps there to bless what he has not matched! 

Laugh not at such marriages! What child has not had reason to weep over its parents? 

Worthy did this man seem, and ripe for the meaning of the earth: but when I saw his wife, the earth seemed to me a home for madcaps. 

Yes, I would that the earth shook with convulsions when a saint and a goose mate with one another. 

This one went forth in quest of truth as a hero, and at last got for himself a small decked-up lie: his marriage he calls it. 

That one was reserved in intercourse and chose choicely. But one time he spoilt his company for all time: his marriage he calls it. 

Another sought a handmaid with the virtues of an angel. But all at once he became the handmaid of a woman, and now would he need also to become an angel. 

Careful, have I found all buyers, and all of them have astute eyes. But even the most astute of them buys his wife in a sack. 

Many short follies - that is called love by you. And your marriage puts an end to many short follies, with one long stupidity. 

Your love to woman, and woman's love to man - ah, would that it were sympathy for suffering and veiled deities! 

But generally two animals alight on one another. But even your best love is only an enraptured simile and a painful ardour. It is a torch to light you to loftier paths. 

Beyond yourselves shall you love some day! Then learn first of all to love. And on that account you had to drink the bitter cup of your love. 

Bitterness is in the cup even of the best love; thus does it cause longing for the overman; thus does it cause thirst in you, the creating one! 

Thirst in the creating one, arrow and longing for the overman: tell me, my brother, is this your will to marriage? Holy call I such a will, and such a marriage. 

Thus spoke Zarathustra.

SOURCE